Emacs vs Vim: Which Text Editor is Better in 2025?

In this tutorial, we will discuss Emacs vs Vim and their similarities and differences. Considering your needs, now you can choose between Vim or Emacs.

Updated: 15 Oct, 25 by Susith Nonis 10 Min

List of content you will read in this article:

If you’re a programmer, developer, Linux user, or sysadmin trying to decide between Emacs vs Vim, you’re not alone. The debate of vim vs emacs has been going on for decades, and even today, many beginners and professionals still ask the same question: Which one should I use?

Whether you're looking for the best text editor for programmers, want an emacs vs vim comparison, or you're simply curious about vim emacs pros and cons, this guide will help you make an informed choice. We’ll cover history, usability, performance, learning curve, customization, real-world use cases, and even how you can combine both using hybrid approaches like Evil Mode.

Before diving deeper, let’s start with a quick feature comparison table:

Feature / Criteria

Emacs

Vim

Release History

1976 (GNU Emacs 1985)

1991 (Improved from Vi, 1976)

Interface Style

GUI & terminal

Terminal-first, lightweight GUI options

Learning Curve

Easier for GUI users

Steeper due to modes

Customization

Extremely high (Lisp-based)

Medium (vimscript + plugins)

Performance

Heavier RAM usage

Fast and lightweight

Plugins & Ecosystem

Large number of emacs vim plugins

Rich plugin support, language servers

Ideal Users

Writers, Lisp users, customization lovers

Sysadmins, DevOps, CLI users

Productivity Speed

Moderate unless customized

Very fast after learning

Modes

Single-mode editing

Insert mode & command mode

Hybrid Use

Supports Vim keybindings (Evil Mode)

Limited Emacs emulation

Text editors are essential tools for software development, system administration, scripting, and file editing. While many Windows users rely on tools like Notepad++, Sublime Text, or Visual Studio Code, the Linux and Unix world has always favored two giants: Emacs and Vim.

The “editor war” between emacs vs vim has shaped developer culture for years. Both tools are deeply rooted in Unix history and remain actively used in 2025 thanks to their efficiency, scripting capabilities, and flexibility.

If you're wondering "vim or emacs, which should I pick?" this guide gives you clarity based on real workflows, customization options, learning paths, and use cases.

Want to explore more editors before choosing? Check out our guide to the Best Linux Text Editors to expand your options.

Understanding where Emacs and Vim came from helps explain why both are still powerful today.

🟣 Emacs: The Oldest Living Editor

  • Originally created in 1976 by David A. Moon and Guy L. Steele.
  • GNU Emacs was released in 1985 by Richard Stallman.
  • Built with Lisp at its core.
  • Designed for extensibility and personalization.
  • Sometimes jokingly called "an OS disguised as an editor" due to its features.

🟢 Vim: Vi Improved

  • The original Vi was created in 1976 by Bill Joy for Unix.
  • Vim (Vi IMproved) was released by Bram Moolenaar in 1991.
  • Lightweight, fast, and terminal-oriented.
  • Designed for efficiency with modal editing (command mode & insert mode).
  • Popular among sysadmins, DevOps engineers, and terminal users.

From 1980s hacker culture to 2025 cloud workflows, both vim emacs ecosystems continue to grow with new plugins, editor modes, and integrations.

🟢 Vim: Fast but Steep to Learn

Most beginners find Vim harder at first because of its modal interface:

  • Insert mode for typing text
  • Command mode for editing and navigation

To exit Vim for the first time, many users even Google :wq or :q!. But for those who master it, Vim becomes one of the fastest tools for editing and refactoring code.

🟣 Emacs: Easier for GUI Users

Emacs offers a more familiar, GUI-like workflow:

  • Uses keyboard combinations (Ctrl, Alt, Meta)
  • Feels intuitive if you're used to IDEs
  • No mode switching for basic usage

Many developers transitioning from Sublime, VS Code, or Atom find Emacs easier than Vim.

💡 Still unsure about vim or emacs as a beginner? We'll give use-case recommendations later.

For another useful comparison in terminal editors, see our guide: 👉 Vim vs Nano

Customization is one of the biggest deciding factors in the emacs vs vim comparison, and this is where the personalities of both editors truly emerge.

Emacs behaves like a programmable platform rather than just a text editor. Built on Emacs Lisp, it allows users to modify or extend nearly every behavior. Many turn it into an all-in-one digital hub, using it not only for coding but also for organizing tasks, tracking projects, managing Git workflows, or even writing long-format documentation. Its legendary Org-mode alone is powerful enough to replace dedicated note-taking or productivity tools.

Vim takes a different philosophy. Instead of inviting full reinvention, it offers a lean foundation that can be expanded through lightweight plugins. Classic Vimscript configurations have evolved into Lua-powered setups in Neovim, allowing for faster and more maintainable extensions. Rather than transforming Vim into a multi-purpose ecosystem, most users enhance only what they need.

If you want deep rewiring and automation, Emacs is unmatched. If you prefer small, modular improvements without altering the core experience, Vim feels more natural. And for developers working inside resource-constrained systems or Linux VPS environments, Vim’s minimal footprint remains a major advantage.

Choosing between vim or emacs often comes down to environment and mindset.

Vim suits those who work inside terminals more than desktops. System administrators, DevOps engineers, and developers who frequently operate over SSH often find Vim already installed on remote machines. When editing configs, scanning logs, or making quick adjustments, its instant startup and keystroke-driven motions make it unbeatable.

Emacs, on the other hand, rewards long-term builders. It attracts developers working on large projects who want more than editing — they want version control integrations, debugging interfaces, and file tree explorers within a single space. Writers and documentation specialists also favor it for its structured workflow tools.

If you’re still undecided, think about your daily rhythm:

Do you hop into files for quick edits? You’ll feel at home in Vim.

Do you live in one tool for hours at a time? Emacs turns into a personal cockpit.

The vim emacs pros and cons debate no longer forces users into separate camps. Modern workflows often merge them.

A popular solution is Evil Mode, which brings Vim-style modal editing directly into Emacs. This allows users to enjoy Vim’s movement efficiency without giving up Emacs’ vast extension ecosystem.

Others go in the opposite direction by configuring Neovim with Emacs-inspired plugins, introducing elisp-like configurations or ergonomic keybindings while staying within a lighter terminal environment.

Rather than choosing one editor forever, many developers now treat Vim as a fast blade and Emacs as a control center, switching depending on context.

Both tools are easier to install today than ever before.

Vim is often pre-installed on Unix-based systems. If needed, it can be added via standard package managers:

sudo apt install vim

sudo dnf install vim

brew install vim

Windows users can install gVim or use Chocolatey or Scoop for terminal versions.

Emacs is just as accessible, available through most repositories or GUI installers. After setup, the real journey begins once you start exploring emacs vim plugins and configuring shortcuts.

Speed is one of Vim’s strongest arguments. It launches instantly, even on minimal hardware, and its modal editing system reduces reliance on navigation keys or mouse clicks. Repetitive edits, file traversal, and search-replace operations feel almost muscle-driven once mastered.

Emacs takes longer to warm up but offers productivity advantages on extended sessions. With integrated debuggers, project-wide navigation, and programmable macros, it rewards users who optimize their environment and stick with it. Over time, many develop custom keybindings that turn Emacs into an extension of their thinking.

If your priority is low-latency responsiveness, especially on remote or low-spec machines, Vim wins. If your goal is a deeply personalized command center, Emacs pays off.

The emacs vs vim question rarely ends with a single champion. It’s more about which mindset you align with.

Choose Vim if you want:

  • Instant terminal access with minimal overhead
  • Fast keystroke navigation and modal efficiency

Choose Emacs if you prefer:

  • A customizable environment that behaves like an IDE
  • A tool that expands into note-taking, documentation, or automation

Or do what many experienced developers now do use both. Let Vim handle surgical edits and remote work, and let Emacs become your long-haul productivity cockpit.

In the end, the best editor is the one that helps your mind move faster than your hands.

If you’re looking to put your favorite text editor to work inside a reliable Linux environment, consider hosting it on a Linux VPS from MonoVM. With instant setup, 24/7 technical support, and high

performance global data centers, you can enjoy the speed and control of Vim or the flexibility of Emacs on a secure, always-available virtual server.

Whether you’re coding, automating tasks, or customizing your workflow, a Linux VPS ensures your tools run smoothly anytime, anywhere.

People also read: 

The biggest difference in the emacs vs vim comparison is that Vim uses modal editing while Emacs uses key combinations. Vim is lightweight and fast; Emacs is highly customizable and extensible.

Beginners who prefer menus and GUI-like workflows may prefer Emacs. Those focused on command-line efficiency may choose Vim.

Vim allows customization and scripting through vimscript and plugins, but Emacs is more flexible overall with elisp and built-in modules.

Evil Mode lets you use Vim keybindings inside Emacs, combining the power of both editors.

Yes. Evil Mode, Neovim plugins, and terminal integrations allow mixing Vim-style editing with Emacs features.

Susith Nonis

Susith Nonis

I'm fascinated by the IT world and how the 1's and 0's work. While I venture into the world of Technology, I try to share what I know in the simplest way with you. Not a fan of coffee, a travel addict, and a self-accredited 'master chef'.

user monovm

Zetta Schultz

2025, Jan, 25

Great post! As someone who recently transitioned to Linux, I found this comparison of Emacs and Vim really helpful. It's intriguing how each editor has carved out its niche, offering powerful features with unique strengths. This detailed breakdown of user interface differences, customization options, and RAM usage is invaluable for anyone trying to make an informed decision about which editor aligns with their workflow. Looking forward to exploring both and seeing which fits best!

user monovm

Autumn Pollich

2025, Jul, 25

This article is a fantastic dive into the world of Emacs and Vim! You've done an excellent job highlighting their unique strengths and features. As someone who's dabbled with both, I can say that understanding their differences in user interface and customization capacity can really enhance your coding efficiency. Whether you're after Vim's speed or Emacs' extensibility, there's a lot to learn here. Great info for anyone looking to choose their ideal text editor!